Me being shocked |
Neo-Freudian:
I'm so clingy I'm gonna dieeeeeeee! |
I don't quite agree with Carl Jung here since I don't really think that archetypes reveal anything about our personality, even on an unconscious level. I, however, agree with Karen Horneye about people using the neurotic strategies. This is because I think I use the "moving towards people" strategy a lot. I notice that whenever I am anxious, I would tell a lot of people about it, especially during exams or when talking to my crush (these really bother me a lot. . .). My friends even joke about how it is obvious when I look stressed out and stuff and how I have to tell EVERYONE about it. I also think I'm a very clingy person, which is maybe why I've been single since birth.
Traits:
THE OOOOOOOCEAAAAN |
Again, the OCEAN model really is a good model because I tend to agree to what it said about my personality, but still though, I don't see how this can be any help to people with mental disorders.
Biological:
It's your fault I'm socially awkward! |
I don't really agree with most of the concepts we learned in this approach. Like for instance, I don't really agree with stimulation levels and introversion/extraversion. I don't think that introverts are much more sensitive to stimulation and such, I think those things are completely different. But still, I think that we can still use the evolutionary theory in personality. I think this is true, even in my case, because I feel very anxious when I'm alone or if l'm rejected by my peers. It really shows how important it is to have company. But other than that, I think this approach is a dud for me.
Humanistic:
SO GLORIOUS |
I really really love this approach! I think that it's really good for once that Psychology focused on positivity and trying to become a better person and stuff. I agree that I think that people strive to become a fully-functioning person. This is because when I feel that I'm not doing our best, I feel really bad inside. I still think that I am still far from a fully-functioning person though, but of course I try my best to learn from my mistake and just do the best I can. I can also relate to what Rogers said in that if things don't match my self-concept, I feel disappointed in myself since I feel I can always do better. I also agree that unconditional positive regard is really important in bringing up people. Regarding Maslow's hierarchy of needs though, I kinda don't really agree with it that much. Still, the humanistic approach is my favorite of all, mostly due to it being positive.
Behavioral:
Awwww cute baby |
I think the behavioral approach has some valid points. It is true that I, as other people, do some things because of reward and I think that you can condition some children's behavior and personality using rewards and punishments. I also like Bandura's social learning theory. I think we learn a lot by observing other people, and his steps in doing this I think really happens in real life, like it does for me. I also like how his theory says that the environment and internal states affect behavior as well and vice versa.
What I don't like though is that besides these, this approach makes it seem that humans are one-dimensional since it shows we are mostly reactive only, which is clearly false.
Cognitive:
Meh. |
I agree with Kelly that people differ in how we process information. I also agree about the research about aggressiveness and it is really applicable in life, though I like violent video games, I am not an aggressive person though since I don't even know how to punch correctly. I also agree with the researches about depression since I myself notice that it really is easy to think of sad thoughts when you are sad and happy thoughts when you are happy. I guess it is true when they say that if you are down, you really are down. But that is all I can say about this personality approach though since I myself am not sure of how my construct systems or schemas look so I really don't know how to look at my personality using this approach. Also, I am not sure if I can say I am a depressed person since even though I think about sad thoughts a lot, I also think about good things a lot as well.
Sikolohiyang Pilipino:
Mabuhay! |
For SP, I am not really sure how I can look at my personality using this. I am Filipino and all and I see how the surface values, pivot and core are really seen in Filipinos, but I feel that research is still lacking since I think that there are much more values that Filipinos value more and I also believe that Kapwa is the real main core of Filipino values since I know that some languages do not even have a word for it. So for now, I can't really use SP in looking at my personality, even if I am Filipino.
Overall:
YAAAAAY |
Based on these, I can really see why personality really is eclectic since I used all theories to look at my personality. But even then, I am still not sure about my personality. Maybe because I need to take therapy to have more tests and find out more about my personality, or maybe because personality, although mostly stable, can still change even at this age. I have some characteristics that I know that show me who I am, as I have mentioned some already, but I still feel that I can still learn more about my personality. That being said, I really liked this course and I think I learned a lot. I wish we could have dwelled more in each theory, especially humanistic, but we can only use so much time. With that, I would like to end by saying it was a good sem and course and I wish to still learn more about personality in the future. :)